We have recently moved the
Creative Class Exchange.

Please update your bookmarks with our new address at www.creativeclass.com

We look forward to your comments and discussion.

Thank you.

Posts by Author

  • Global Trends
  • Ask Rana: Advice on Work, Life and Play
  • Urban Digs, Creative Class Communities
  • Workplace
  • Entrepreneurship, Creative Class Strategies
  • Creative Class Research and Indicators
  • Architecture + Design

Video Interview

Watch a Speech

Hear a Speech




July 20, 2007

Richard Florida

New Report from NSF

« By the Numbers: Creative Density | Main | Whole Place Development »


In a recently released report, the National Science Foundation notes that

[T]he number of U.S. science and engineering (S&E) articles in major peer-reviewed journals flattened in the 1990s, after more than two decades of growth, but U.S. influence in world science and technology remains strong.  The report, Changing U.S. Output of Scientific Articles: 1988 - 2003, finds changes occurred despite continued increases in funding and personnel for research and development. Flattening occurred in nearly all U.S. research disciplines and types of institutions.  In contrast, emerging Asian nations had large increases in publication numbers, reflecting their growing expertise in science and technology. European Union totals also went up.

So, the U.S. is basically spending more to achieve exactly the same thing?

Related Websites
Changing U.S. Output of Scientific Articles: 1988–2003: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07320/
The Changing Research and Publication Environment in American Research Universities: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srs07204/

posted by Kevin Stolarick


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Report from NSF:


Stuart Murray

There is the possibility that the increased funding is ending up in for-profit research, which doesn't tend to end up in public domain academic journals. Any data on that?

Carlee Mallard

Perhaps less articles are getting past the review process and/or the journals are being pickier about the articles they are publishing?

The comments to this entry are closed.