We have recently moved the
Creative Class Exchange.

Please update your bookmarks with our new address at www.creativeclass.com

We look forward to your comments and discussion.

Thank you.

Posts by Author

  • Global Trends
  • Ask Rana: Advice on Work, Life and Play
  • Urban Digs, Creative Class Communities
  • Workplace
  • Entrepreneurship, Creative Class Strategies
  • Creative Class Research and Indicators
  • Architecture + Design

Video Interview

Watch a Speech

Hear a Speech




April 26, 2008

« Rising from the Sands | Main | Mega-Regions of the Future-Past »

David Schleicher, Climenko Fellow at Law Harvard Law School, has an intriguing new paper "Why is There No Partisan Competition in City Council Elections? The Role of Election Law," coming in the Journal of Law and Politics. His basic argument is that there is "nothing natural about the lack of partisan competition in elections in American cities. Instead, the lack of competition is likely the result of a system of anticompetitive election laws that make it difficult for the local major party that is the minority to differentiate itself from its national parent. When combined with substantial residential segregation by political party and a first-past-the-post system that creates serious barriers to entry for third-party entrants, the result is uncompetitive and unrepresentative local elections."

The complete paper is here.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rethinking Urban Politics:


Mike L.

Yes, in our recent city election here in Australia, the national party affiliations (if any) of candidates were ignored by the voters as irrelevant. Everything was based on local issues. The main local issue was "development vs. the environment", and both major national parties are perceived by the local voters to be pre-development. The environmentalists won.

The comments to this entry are closed.