We have recently moved the
Creative Class Exchange.

Please update your bookmarks with our new address at www.creativeclass.com

We look forward to your comments and discussion.

Thank you.

Posts by Author

  • Global Trends
  • Ask Rana: Advice on Work, Life and Play
  • Urban Digs, Creative Class Communities
  • Workplace
  • Entrepreneurship, Creative Class Strategies
  • Creative Class Research and Indicators
  • Architecture + Design

Video Interview

Watch a Speech

Hear a Speech

Speaking

Technorati

SiteMeter

January 18, 2008

« Flight of the Creative Lab | Main | Those Darn Kids »

The NY Times interviews Scott Page:

What the model showed was that diverse groups of problem solvers outperformed the groups of the best individuals at solving problems. The reason: the diverse groups got stuck less often than the smart individuals, who tended to think similarly.

The other thing we did was to show in mathematical terms how when making predictions, a group’s errors depend in equal parts on the ability of its members to predict and their diversity. This second theorem can be expressed as an equation: collective accuracy = average accuracy + diversity.

A paradigm shift is well in the making. Seems like diversity matters a whole lot more than most people - and standard economic theory - would have guessed.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7f569e200e54fe51fd68833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Diversity = Productivity:

Comments

Mike Linacre

Thanks for posting this, Richard. In similar work in 1994, Prof. Ben Wright of U. Chicago derived that, in Page's terminology, "collective accuracy = average accuracy + logarithm (number of diverse approaches)"

reawOraxarp

http://wmlwz.kilu.de/jussus.html nurse and christmas ornament

The comments to this entry are closed.